All Posts for July 2009

Let's Call the Whole Thing Off!

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

They’re called divorce suits, because nothing but a divorce seems to suit.  

Henny Youngman 

Cemetery Flowers

 

When I first thought about doing this blog, about two years ago,  I wasn’t sure that divorce was still a “hot topic.” Then I saw the mini-series, Starter Wife, with Debra Messing and realized that divorce is still a household word.  But when I saw the article last week on the Internet from The Atlantic by author Sandra Tsing Loh, I knew that the subject of divorce is still a difficult, but timely topic.

Sandra, married 20 years, opens her article with the statement, “Sadly, and to my horror, I am divorcing…..”  I remember when people asked me if I was over my divorce, and I thought, How can you be over something that took 30 years of your life?  Instead, I choose to say I survived my divorce, but barely.  I also remember when Molly Katzen, famous cookbook author of The Moosewood Cookbook and others,  was asked how she survived her divorce.  She said she didn’t. She died and was reborn. I can certainly identify with that statement!

 

Summer CactusIMG_0039

 

Again, in the Internet article,  Sandra goes on to ask, …”isn’t the idea of lifelong marriage obsolete?” According to the author, Americans have the highest divorce rate in the Western world, which she attributes to  the paradox of holding onto two cultures at the same time: a culture of marriage and a culture of individualism.  My take on this is that with Betty Friedan’s ground-shattering book, The Feminine Mystic, those of us brought up in the 50s and 60s started to rethink our role as “housewives.”  We wanted to have the same opportunities as our spouses, even if that meant being on our own.

What is even more upsetting to me is that the rate of divorce in second marriages (about 60%)  is higher than in first (about 50%).  Now that I am married a second time, this statistic gives me food for thought, because having divorced once, if there is a next time, will I survive emotionally and financially, when I am already at an age when holding down a full-time job  would be difficult?

 

PansiesIMG_0065

 

The article does not end on a happy note, but then divorce is not easy, even when it is amicable.  There is a lot of history to sort through and a great deal of rethinking and recreating of your life after many years with the same person, whether the years were good or bad.  Loh suggests a different kind of living relationship, one that does not include monogamy, which many Americans find unsavory.

I think each woman has to figure out what works for her and help those around her understand that, without being in sync or at peace with herself, she won’t function at her best. Children always seem to suffer, but better to have one loving parent than two parents always yelling at or ignoring each other. In the end, each of us must sort out the pros and cons of marriage and divorce and do whatever works best.

 

OrangeIMG_0053

 

Speaking of which, over the week-end I saw Woody Allen’s movie, Whatever Works, which involves marriage and divorce.  It is cynical, funny, sad, and very Woody Allen.  I think whatever works for you may create pain for others in the beginning, so when you venture into the maze and daze of divorce, tread lightly and lovingly with those you care about, while also taking care of your own heart. As my friend Daniel says, Love cannot be hurt.♥

To read the entire article: On Marriage: Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off, Google the article’s name and the site will come up. Thanx to my friend Honey for alerting me that the address I first posted did not work.

Food, Inc.: A Searing Expose of the Food Processing Industry

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

foodinc.jpg

The new documentary, Food, Inc. is a searing expose of food conglomerates that control our food supply, from farm to table. Narrated by Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation and Michael Pollan, author of several food books, the most recent one entitled In Defense of Food (Click on my Book Reviews), the movie is upsetting and enlightening.

While I have been a vegetarian for decades and therefore have been aware of much of what the movie portrays, I was still moved to tears and also to nausea at some of the graphically illustrated displays of slaughterhouses and chicken farms. Not surprisingly, the food companies that own these farms, or essentially own the farmers, refused to be interviewed. Monsanto and Purdue are big players in this movie as only two examples of how their desire for profit outweighs every other consideration of the farmers’ needs, the workers’ needs, and the safety and care of the animals that become the food on our tables.

This is not an easy movie to watch. I cried when the mother of a 2 ½ year old talks about the death of her son Kevin. She has been working for six years to get Kevin’s Law passed. (There is another Kevin’s Law about a 24-year old mental patient. This Kevin’s Law refers to Food, Inc.) The law would have been formally known as the Meat and Poultry Pathogen Reduction and Enforcement Act of 2003. The bill was introduced by Rep. Anna G. Eshoo, D-Palo Atlo, as H.R. 3160. Kevin’s Law was named in memory of two-year-old Kevin Kowalcyk, who died in 2001 after eating a hamburger contaminated with E. coli O157:H7. The law would have given the U.S. Department of Agriculture the power to close down plants that produce contaminated meat. The bill never became law.

I also became upset when I saw the animals and the workers who “process” the animals. Many are Mexicans who are being arrested as part of the scheme to stay within the law surrounding food safety. Unfortunately, they are replaced by more Mexicans, and the processing plant continues to belch out its products untouched by the law, because the manufactured food lobby is strong and government administrators are often former CEOs of the food conglomerates.

Not all the news is bad. There are many scenes that are hopeful, especially those focusing on a farmer who farms the “old-fashioned” way and the owner of Stonyfield Yogurt, who has Wal-Mart buying his organic products. While we may dislike many of Wal-Mart’s marketing policies, Stonyfield believes that reaching millions of people through Wal-Mart stores means more people will eat healthier. Thus, the movie makes a strong attempt to be balanced. But the main message is clear: We have given our farms to Monsanto (and others like Monsanto) and our kitchen to Betty Crocker (and other packaged food companies).

The movie is an eye opener for those of us who have been living with the myth/hope that our food is still produced as it was in our grandparents’ day. The movie ends with the emphasis that we vote with our food dollars and therefore can change the world with every bite. There is a website that you can go to that gives us hope. See the movie and/or click on www.takepart.com/foodinc. The title of the website is Hungry for Change, and there are several tabs. I signed the petition for safer food in schools under the tab Take Action. Please use your fork and knife to protect our food supply!

foodinc.jpg

Subscribe